To keep up with the evolving nature of legal research, many lawyers have turned to AI tools like large language models (LLMs) to assist them. These tools, such as ChatGPT, have become increasingly popular for tasks like legal research and writing summaries of case law. However, some attorneys have run into trouble when these AI tools generate inaccurate information or even completely fictional citations.
Despite the risks, the use of AI in the legal profession continues to grow. In a survey conducted by Thomson Reuters, 63% of lawyers reported using AI tools in their work, with 12% using them regularly. These tools are seen as time-saving and efficient, allowing attorneys to focus on providing valuable legal advice rather than producing documents.
However, recent cases have highlighted the potential dangers of relying too heavily on AI-generated content. From fake citations in court filings to misrepresentations of case law, attorneys must be cautious when using these tools. The American Bar Association has issued guidance on the use of LLMs and other AI tools, emphasizing the importance of maintaining competence and understanding the risks involved.
While some, like Andrew Perlman, believe that generative AI will revolutionize the legal profession, others, including Judge Michael Wilner, caution against outsourcing critical tasks to AI technology without proper verification. Ultimately, the use of AI tools in the legal field requires a balance between efficiency and accuracy to ensure the delivery of quality legal services.
